Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small refactoring of Wait* commands 🐏 #2253

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2020

Conversation

vdemeester
Copy link
Member

Changes

This makes WaitFor* with pipeline resource more generic, you can use
Succeed or Failed with WaitForPipelineRunState and
WaitForTaskrRunState.

This reduces some duplication. Keeping the old function so that we
don't need to fix all those call at the current time.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester vdemeest@redhat.com

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Mar 19, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 19, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 19, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @sbwsg @dibyom @afrittoli @bobcatfish

This makes WaitFor* with pipeline resource more generic, you can use
`Succeed` or `Failed` with `WaitForPipelineRunState` and
`WaitForTaskrRunState`.

This reduces some duplication. Keeping the old function so that we
don't need to fix all those call at the current time.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vdemeest@redhat.com>
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 20, 2020

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 20, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot assigned ghost Mar 20, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 20, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 212e3d4 into tektoncd:master Mar 20, 2020
@vdemeester vdemeester deleted the refactoring-wait branch March 20, 2020 17:01
@afrittoli afrittoli added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Apr 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants